Our political candidate evaluation framework is built on extensive analysis of 300+ real-world political crises, identifying recurring patterns, risk factors, and competency gaps across diverse political contexts. The model is continuously reviewed and updated with new cases to ensure maximum relevance and effectiveness.
PoliticalCheck is a comprehensive framework developed by ValuesCheck for political candidate reputational risk assessment. It's used for political due diligence, candidate vetting, and political competency evaluation before electoral processes, appointments, or institutional designations.
The methodology is built on inductive analysis of 300+ real-world political crisis cases, ensuring comprehensive coverage of diverse political contexts. This empirical approach enables identification of patterns, recurring risks, and specific competency gaps.
The framework classifies political crises into 11 main categories (corruption, incompetence, personal scandals, crisis management, etc.) and evaluates 9 core political competencies (ethical integrity, crisis communication, leadership, technical capability, etc.). Each documented case enables identification of risk patterns and specific weaknesses in candidate profiles.
Comprehensive political crisis taxonomy built through inductive analysis of 300+ real-world cases. Systematic classification of situations that generate communication and reputational crises in the political sphere. Each category includes specific subcategories and concrete reputational risk indicators identified empirically.
Political competency assessment framework that defines the essential attributes, capabilities, and behaviors required for effective public office. Each competency breaks down into specific subcategories and components enabling objective, granular identification of candidate strengths and weaknesses.
PoliticalCheck provides the methodology and framework to conduct thorough candidate screening and reputational due diligence for your organization.